so I've noticed that before the update a player could have a creature with more than one attack,use one attack and save the other so you can choose to defend instead.. not like that now.. takes out the question of what a player will do with a ccreature, if you don't use it, you loose it and the card can not still defend like before.. with the new way of adding more defences and attack did this have to change for balance or was it unintended and just happened? I personally like the old way it worked. just balance is most important so if that the reason I totally understand.

Not the first comment I hear about that

I think we are gonna go back to the old way where you can only add 1 attack or defense to the same creature. Seems like people is not happy with this change because some cards turn out too powerful and would requier a rebalance in order to avoid that.

Also a card with multiple attacks will be desactivated if it makes use of one of its attacks (it was buggy before the updated).... makes sense?

yes, I like the old way too the more I look at it. rebalance is hard to work. try not to change much, I feel the new cards are mostly good balance. maybe consider Kazan and limiting that card to 2 instead of 3?? 3 for 20 damage each is a bit much.. I have seen many new good ideas and that is good stuff. less predictable opponents deck